Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/18/26 8:50 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:28:33 -0700, dart200
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
>>>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
>>>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
>>>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
>>>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been
>>>>>>>> prosperous enough
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8
>>>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain
>>>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     > you people are fucking psychos tbh
>>>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>>>     > #god
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>>
>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>>>
>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>
>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>
>>
>> creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the
>> term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy
> 
> Not so.

🙄🙄🙄

-- 
🅷🅸, 🅸'🅼 🅽🅸🅲🅺!
🅻🅴🆃'🆂 🅴🅽🅳 🆆🅰🆁 🙃