Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live 
>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, 
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u 
>>>>>> fucking
>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% 
>>>>>> latino, 5%
>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact 
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that 
>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much 
>>>>>> of a
>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing 
>>>>> Putin
>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>>
>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>>>
>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>
>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>
>>
>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of 
>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That 
>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>
>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders-foreign- 
>> workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>
>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a statement 
>> foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. Around 20,000 people 
>> are expected to be affected by the order, most of them Chinese citizens.
>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will be 
>> deported, he added."
>>
>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/beijing-and- 
>> manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-worsen
>>
>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation plant, 
>> prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."
>>
>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy around 
>> immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't follow their 
>> rules.
>>
> 
> err some filipino official saying something and it actually happening 
> are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did actually deport 
> some, but to the extent that this actually stopped anything is a totally 
> different matter
> 
> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far from 
> other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to speak of. 
> they just don't have the resources to meaningfully protect their borders 
> all that well.
> 
> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by 
> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find really 
> detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain dead everywhere.
> 
> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they wanted 
> to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is just propaganda 
> for sub-critical sheeple like you
> 

You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to protect 
their people from being overwhelmed.