Re: wilson is a racist

On 8/19/2026 4:17 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/19/26 11:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/18/2026 6:00 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/18/26 2:20 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/18/2026 4:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/18/26 9:26 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 11:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 5:25 PM, Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideological.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in fact an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us. That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a sample.  The list is long, including attempts to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosecute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure does 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sink you into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> course you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you see me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflated that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy with the whole state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> banks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Jews
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>> planted on the inside.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nation
>>>>>>>>>>>> states because psychos like you want to live in an fake 
>>>>>>>>>>>> illusion of
>>>>>>>>>>>> general prosperity
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in 
>>>>>>>>>>> nation
>>>>>>>>>>> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of 
>>>>>>>>>> movement for
>>>>>>>>>> 7/8ths people on the planet???
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even newer
>>>>>>>> world order".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you cross
>>>>>>>> a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not even sure
>>>>>>>> about that.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes were so normalized to shitting all over basic freedom of 
>>>>>>> movement, to point where 7/8 people on this planet are chained to 
>>>>>>> their nation state without any choice in the matter, we should 
>>>>>>> just keep doing it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just like we should have just kept around slavery, eh???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it's funny u think this shitshow of a subethical species even 
>>>>>>> deserves sustainability. but the jokes truly on me cause most of 
>>>>>>> u chucklefucks have ur head shoved so far up ur asshole u can't 
>>>>>>> even admit there's a problem
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   > cause it would completely break the fragile ideology u preach
>>>>>>>   >
>>>>>>>   > #god
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cons and not wanting to study things cause they can't handle the 
>>>>>>> truth: name a more iconic duo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the country you're living in?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> this nation is literally just a bunch of fucking immigrants u 
>>>>> racist tard. it doesn't even function like a single coherent 
>>>>> nation, it functions more like 12 separate identities
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2eTN6yDRGE
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you want to destroy the country because you hate it.
>>>
>>> repetition fallacy is a fallacy bro
>>>
>>>   > not that u know what coherent rational
>>>   >
>>>   > #god
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Many such cases!
>>>>
>>>
>>> there's no particularly coherent rational beyond ur incessant racism 
>>> that people from other countries can't participate productively in 
>>> our economy like 50 million foreign born individuals in america from 
>>> all over the world already are doing
>>>
>>> i have no idea what more kind of evidence u even need
>>
>> Illegal is still illegal.
> 
> i see you've given up on defending your abject racism
> 
>>
>> The state is in charge of immigration because that's what /most/ of 
>> the people want.
>>
> 
> i know u can't read properly due to your biases, so this will go 
> completely over ur head:
> 
> but nowhere in the us constitution does it actually grant congressional 
> power to limit immigration, and 10th amendment explicitly restricts the 
> federal govt from doing anything beyond it's enumerated powers
> 

That actually might be accurate. Score one for Nick. Of course the 
Supremes have ruled that they /do/ have that power. Just like they've 
ruled all sorts of things that the constitution doesn't actually say.

So score one for the power aggrandizers in DC as well.