Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?
dart200 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote: > On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote: >>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote: >>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live >>>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who >>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their >>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in >>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, >>>>>>> they >>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u >>>>>>> fucking >>>>>>> racist tard >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) >>>>>>>> destroy their nation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% >>>>>>> latino, 5% >>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our >>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to >>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact >>>>>>> people >>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the >>>>>>>> residents who >>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh >>>>>>> feeeelz" you >>>>>>> inhumane prick >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that >>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>> destroyed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic >>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much >>>>>>> of a >>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would >>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing >>>>>> Putin >>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines? >>>>> >>>>> Fallacy alert: ad absurdum. You really gotta cut that out, wilson. >>>> >>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply >>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them. >>>> >>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid. >>>> >>> >>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of >>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That >>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all. >>> >>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- >>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/ >>> >>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a statement >>> foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. Around 20,000 >>> people are expected to be affected by the order, most of them Chinese >>> citizens. >>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will be >>> deported, he added." >>> >>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/beijing- >>> and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-worsen >>> >>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly >>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation plant, >>> prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits." >>> >>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy around >>> immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't follow >>> their rules. >>> >> >> err some filipino official saying something and it actually happening >> are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did actually deport >> some, but to the extent that this actually stopped anything is a >> totally different matter >> >> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far from >> other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to speak of. >> they just don't have the resources to meaningfully protect their >> borders all that well. >> >> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by >> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find really >> detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain dead >> everywhere. >> >> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they wanted >> to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is just >> propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you >> > > You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to protect > their people from being overwhelmed. > and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing: you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃