Re: wilson is a racist

On 8/19/26 2:07 PM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/19/2026 4:17 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/19/26 11:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/18/2026 6:00 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/18/26 2:20 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/18/2026 4:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/18/26 9:26 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 11:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 5:25 PM, Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideological.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in fact an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the us. That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a sample.  The list is long, including attempts 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to prosecute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shit. That does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure does 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sink you into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> course you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you see me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflated that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy with the whole state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> banks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Jews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planted on the inside.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> states because psychos like you want to live in an fake 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> illusion of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> general prosperity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nation
>>>>>>>>>>>> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of 
>>>>>>>>>>> movement for
>>>>>>>>>>> 7/8ths people on the planet???
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even newer
>>>>>>>>> world order".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you cross
>>>>>>>>> a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not even sure
>>>>>>>>> about that.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yes were so normalized to shitting all over basic freedom of 
>>>>>>>> movement, to point where 7/8 people on this planet are chained 
>>>>>>>> to their nation state without any choice in the matter, we 
>>>>>>>> should just keep doing it...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> just like we should have just kept around slavery, eh???
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it's funny u think this shitshow of a subethical species even 
>>>>>>>> deserves sustainability. but the jokes truly on me cause most of 
>>>>>>>> u chucklefucks have ur head shoved so far up ur asshole u can't 
>>>>>>>> even admit there's a problem
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   > cause it would completely break the fragile ideology u preach
>>>>>>>>   >
>>>>>>>>   > #god
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cons and not wanting to study things cause they can't handle the 
>>>>>>>> truth: name a more iconic duo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the country you're living in?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this nation is literally just a bunch of fucking immigrants u 
>>>>>> racist tard. it doesn't even function like a single coherent 
>>>>>> nation, it functions more like 12 separate identities
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2eTN6yDRGE
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you want to destroy the country because you hate it.
>>>>
>>>> repetition fallacy is a fallacy bro
>>>>
>>>>   > not that u know what coherent rational
>>>>   >
>>>>   > #god
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Many such cases!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there's no particularly coherent rational beyond ur incessant racism 
>>>> that people from other countries can't participate productively in 
>>>> our economy like 50 million foreign born individuals in america from 
>>>> all over the world already are doing
>>>>
>>>> i have no idea what more kind of evidence u even need
>>>
>>> Illegal is still illegal.
>>
>> i see you've given up on defending your abject racism
>>
>>>
>>> The state is in charge of immigration because that's what /most/ of 
>>> the people want.
>>>
>>
>> i know u can't read properly due to your biases, so this will go 
>> completely over ur head:
>>
>> but nowhere in the us constitution does it actually grant 
>> congressional power to limit immigration, and 10th amendment 
>> explicitly restricts the federal govt from doing anything beyond it's 
>> enumerated powers
>>
> 
> That actually might be accurate. Score one for Nick. Of course the 

if u look it up plenty of the founding fathers were skeptical of the 
feds restricting immigration

> Supremes have ruled that they /do/ have that power. Just like they've 
> ruled all sorts of things that the constitution doesn't actually say.
> 
> So score one for the power aggrandizers in DC as well.
> 

  > lawyers can have great trouble with reading words accurately
  >
  > #god

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃