Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?
dart200 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote: > On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote: >>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who >>>>>>>>>>>> live there. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the >>>>>>>>>>>> people who >>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on >>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't >>>>>>>>>>>> fit in >>>>>>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking >>>>>>>>>>> about, they >>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity >>>>>>>>>>> u fucking >>>>>>>>>>> racist tard >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% >>>>>>>>>>> latino, 5% >>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our >>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't >>>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the >>>>>>>>>>> fact people >>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the >>>>>>>>>>>> residents who >>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people >>>>>>>>>>> on this >>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh >>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you >>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that >>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of >>>>>>>>>>> economic >>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that >>>>>>>>>>> much of a >>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians >>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin >>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert: ad absurdum. You really gotta cut that out, >>>>>>>>> wilson. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply >>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of >>>>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That >>>>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- >>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a >>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. >>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order, >>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens. >>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will >>>>>>> be deported, he added." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/ >>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions- >>>>>>> worsen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly >>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation >>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy >>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't >>>>>>> follow their rules. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually >>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did >>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually stopped >>>>>> anything is a totally different matter >>>>>> >>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far >>>>>> from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to >>>>>> speak of. they just don't have the resources to meaningfully >>>>>> protect their borders all that well. >>>>>> >>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by >>>>>> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find >>>>>> really detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain >>>>>> dead everywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they >>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is >>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to >>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed. >>>>> >>>> >>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing: >>>> >>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently >>>> >>> >>> What do you mean by "fair". >>> >> >> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 7/8ths >> of the planet to their respective nation states, because opening it up >> and allowing the market to work freely across borders is "unfair" to you > > Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling you > what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points. > and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually accepting in the fairness of open free markets -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃