Re: Global Warming Alert

At Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:54:59 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 24, 2026 at 5:04:27 AM EDT, "dart200"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/23/26 7:31 PM, Creon wrote:
> >> At Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:49:55 -0700, dart200
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/21/26 11:50 AM, Dude wrote:
> >>>> On 8/18/2026 2:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/18/26 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/18/2026 1:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 8/18/26 9:26 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 11:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 5:25 PM, Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude
> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being ideological. You think you're dealing in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the realm of truthiness while I'm just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're just repeating what your media
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> told you, things that tickle your preset
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> biases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refusal to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo, and the attack on the attempt to count
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electoral ballots was in fact an attack and not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something else, and that election fraud might
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the us. That is a sample.  The list is long,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shit. That does not put me on throne of belief.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  But it sure does sink you into the depths of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delusion.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even see that's what you're standing on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you don't we have been over this stuff
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so many times.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debater and you see me the same way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from which you "learned" that California didn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allow controlled burns.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't remember where I saw it and maybe I was the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one who conflated that policy with the whole state.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder how many other "facts" of that provenence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you hold in your memory banks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believes the Jews attacked the WTC on 9/11 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down the WTC-7 with explosives planted on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inside.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their nation states because psychos like you want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> live in an fake illusion of general prosperity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in nation states. Only a very tiny minority are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> stateless.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> movement for 7/8ths people on the planet???
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even
> >>>>>>>>>> newer world order".
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you
> >>>>>>>>>> cross a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not
> >>>>>>>>>> even sure about that.)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> yes were so normalized to shitting all over basic freedom
> >>>>>>>>> of movement, to point where 7/8 people on this planet are
> >>>>>>>>> chained to their nation state without any choice in the
> >>>>>>>>> matter, we should just keep doing it...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> just like we should have just kept around slavery, eh???
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> it's funny u think this shitshow of a subethical species
> >>>>>>>>> even deserves sustainability. but the jokes truly on me
> >>>>>>>>> cause most of u chucklefucks have ur head shoved so far up
> >>>>>>>>> ur asshole u can't even admit there's a problem
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>    > cause it would completely break the fragile ideology u
> >>>>>>>>>    > preach
> >>>>>>>>>    >
> >>>>>>>>>    > #god
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> cons and not wanting to study things cause they can't
> >>>>>>>>> handle the truth: name a more iconic duo
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the country you're living in?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> this nation is literally just a bunch of fucking immigrants u
> >>>>>>> racist tard. it doesn't even function like a single coherent
> >>>>>>> nation, it functions more like 12 separate identities
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We look forward to your questions concerning Albert Einstein's
> >>>>>> theory of mass and the paradox of time warping. Go!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> again, dud you keep bleating on about enlightenment, but u
> >>>>> display nothing of the sort in the slightest
> >>>>>
> >>>> You came here. For what? To bleat about enlightenment?
> >>>
> >>> YES WHERE IS THAT ENLIGHTENMENT YOU TARD???
> >>
>
> Creon tells how it is:
> >> If you sit, after a while, your practice will deepen.
> >>
> >> Once you've experienced kensho, your perspective will
> >> realign itself.
>
>
> So, Creon, whose perspective...yours? Or maybe something you've been
> told it (kensho) should look like. . And you bought it. ;) - Cali
> flake

?

I don't call you names...what gives?

>
>
>
> >>
> >
> > nignog there ain't a whole lot of fucking "hUmIlItY" actually
> > present in ye old group of senile cons,
>
> I'f you're looking for humility Nick, this is not the place to find
> it. They don't believe in it.
>
> >
> > and this is entirely independent on the amount of enlightenment
> > present,
> >
> >> which is exactly and precisely none thus far
>
> Does anyone really know what so called 'enlightenment' is. From what
> I can ken, it's something about a certain reality that you 'realize'.
> Something specific that you've been told that you should realize
> (when you 'become' enlightened, that is). And, of course, happiness
> and fullfillment is now yours. And you get to tell other people what
> to do.
>
>  Why is it that you can get 'enlightened' if you're a Christian, (St
>  Paul
> etc), a Buddhist, or in any other belief system. The problem is that
> what you 'realize' as a so called, enlightened being is different
> from what someone else has been told they should realize according to
> the doctrine they've bought in to and embraced.
>
>
> That's ok, you know..different strokes, eh.
>
> But, I'm not now or ever will be enlightened, and blasphemer that I
> am, I really think the whole enlightenment thing is a made up crock.
>
> However, on second thought, who are they to say that I'm not
> enlightened. Or that I am. How would they know one way or the other.
> Oh yeah, I forgot, if I believe what they do, right?
>
> I am enlightened and so are you. But not in accord with the Buddhist
> idea of what it is - and not conditional or in accord with any other
> belief system.
>
> I won't be replying if you (Nick) or anyone else decides to answer
> this post. Be/Stay well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> #god
> Yeah!



-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "Be wewy wewy quiet... I'm hunting Womulins!!"