Re: Newscum barfs lies again
clams casino <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.california,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.california.illegals,alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/14/2024 9:12 PM, Siri Cruise wrote: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Siri Cruise <[email protected]> wrote in news:vh61gv$325l2$1@dont- >> email.me: >> >>> clams casino wrote: >>>> On 11/14/2024 12:06 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>> At $10,000 per deportation what do >>>>> you propose doing >>>> >>>> They walked all the way here - they can walk all the way home. >>> >>> Nothing can be done until a court is paid to issue a deportation >>> order. >>> >>> Mexican nationals can be deported by just driving them to the >>> border and pushing them across. >>> >> >> And Haitian can be just pushed into the ocean. >> >> Just What Jesus Would Do. > > That is returning them to their own nation. At that point Mexico is > responsible for its own citizens in Mexico. This is acceptable for Mexican illegals, and make no mistake, illegal they are. > Mexico may decide its responsibility is to try to force the US to > coordinate the transfers. Scheinbaum is a hard core Marxist tool, so she will obstruct the return of her non-performing social assets/expats. > Mexicans in Mexico can demand their government's protection. Drom what - cartels? Claudia has done jack shit nada to end them. > Haitians in the Atlantic have no one to turn to. Non sequitur. They took along swim and it didn't work out - wah... > What Jesus will do is likely to apply Leviticus which demands you treat > foreigners in your land as one of your own. To not abuse or harm > foreigners. You will _never_ speak for Jesus! Nor will you ever overwrite your own craven Marxist political needs on to His history as if you have the slightest clue as to the date of His return or just which events on the dais today might apply. You're a sour-minded deceitful hater, and not one word you say can be taken at face value. > I want open borders, but I know that is not compatible with the law or > racists. 1.) YOU do not _need_ open borders. 2.) Yes open borders are illegal. 3.) Racism will _increase_ with "open borders" and may already have done so. Just look at yourself, you scumsucking, vile cunt.