Re: Democrat illogical hysteria and physics contradictions
Trevor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.military.navalsci.physics,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.california |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ken <[email protected]> wrote: > Trevor wrote: > > A week ago, Retarded California <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The US Navy will fire a few naval artillery shells weighing anywhere > >> from 5 pounds to 2000 pounds, inland on to a Camp Pendleton, California > >> firing range in an early celebration of the US Marine Corps birthday. > >> > >> To ensure the safety of passing motorists, the I-5 freeway will be > >> briefly closed for the same period of the average vehicle accident. > >> > >> The ranges are safe, the Navy has done this multiple times before, no > >> freeways were closed, and there was no mention of it in the media. The > >> Navy generally uses San Clemente Island for gunnery practice and > >> infrequently Camp Pendleton. > >> > >> The horse's ass fool of a California Democrat governor Gavin Newsom,had > >> a fit claiming thousands of lives are at stake and the federally funded > >> freeway could not be closed. He was trolled and wrong as usual. > > > > How do you feel now that you've been proven spectacularly wrong? > > > > Launching artillery over civilians is not a safe thing. As we found out. > > > Using your logic and reasons, we should stop flying airplanes over cities. Do you know the difference between artillery rounds and airplanes? Artillery rounds are intended to cause death and destruction. They are relatively cheaply built, not rigorously tested and maintained, and uncontrolled. A lot like a maga. Airplanes are proven safe and have non-destructive uses. What a miserable excuse for an analogy.