Re: Joni Mitchell is straight-type-2 female
David Dalton <[email protected]> Tue, 03 May 2022 23:39:19 -0230
| Newsgroups | alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip, alt.celebrities, alt.music, rec.music.misc, alt.rock-n-roll |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eternal September |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 3, 2022, David Dalton wrote (in article<[email protected]>): > I am the latest avatar type, and my primary siddhi has been matchmaking, > whereas that of Jesus was probably healing. I have had two accurate > matchmaking periods, from March 8--20, 2019, and from April 9 to > July 2, 2021. My related Eight Sexual Harmonics theory is summarized on > https://www.nfld.com//~dalton/8H.html . > > In 2019 I intuited that Joni Michell is straight-type-2-F (female compatible > and orgasmic up close only with bims, i.e. males attracted to both genders) > and that two possible matches for her are Tom Waits and Bill Clinton. > > I also intuited that she had an old lock (a bond between her and a bim > or bimT, spiritually bim in female form, that formed earlier in her > life by electric/warming compatible touch and powerful eye contact, > not necessarily at the same time, which would have meant that > she could not be involved with another bim without the permission > of her primary bim or bimT). This old lock should have been > dissolved recently so she should now be able to get bims who she > is attracted to. But if it has not been dissolved she would still need > to get that permission. > > What about her possible matches to bims (males attracted to > both genders, not necessarily having sex with both genders) > Tom Waits and/or Bill Clinton (note that I said that straight-type-1-F > Hillary Clinton is compatible e.g.. with straight-type-1-M Garth Brooks)? > Both have been partially compatible (less than optimally compatible > and less likely to stick) with their spouses. However this is > complicated by the fact that Goddess (who many call God) > has recently made 60.6% of committed relationships more > ((usually optimally) sexually compatible. If Tom and Kathleen > have been made optimally sexually compatible then Tom is > not available for Joni. If Bill and Hillary have been made optimally > sexually compatible then Bill is not available for Joni. And even > if Tom and Kathleen and Bill and Hillary are still partially > compatible they may decide to stick together. But if there > has been abuse in their relationships they may have been > split across species boundaries in the species split and > would no longer be compatible. > > Actually in 2019 I didn’t divine Kathleen’s sexual harmonic(s) > and if she is bimT (like Billy Joel’s wife, Billy is bim and > they are compatible e.g. with straight-type-2-F Gwyneth Paltrow, > who also had an old lock) then both she and Tom are compatible > with Joni. If Kathleen is gayT then there can be a bridged > relationship of Joni--Tom--Kathleen. > > But regardless of the possible match to Tom Waits and/or > Bill Clinton, Joni Mitchell should now be able to get > bims (males attracted to both genders) who she is > attracted to, unless the permission I mentioned above > is still needed. Note that straight-type-2 females > with an old lock may have identified as asexual > and straight-type-2 males with an old lock (e.g. > Chris Isaak) may have identified as incel. I did suggest a match for Chris Isaak on the “various matches” thread on alt.religion.druid , which is also linked to (and searchable) near the bottom of https://www.nfld.com//~dalton/8H.html . The possible bif (female attracted to both genders) match is Melania Trump. I suggested a match for bim Donald Trump who is straight-type-2-F Sarah Palin, who had an old lock. If Melania and Donald choose to stay together then I guess Chris and Sarah would be able to figure out compatibility by who they are now attracted to (who would have to be in their respective species and not involved with another straight-type-2). But Melania and Donald could note that optimally sexually compatible relationships result in longer lifespans than partially compatible (which includes bim--bif) ones which in turn have resulted in longer lifespans than incompatible one-way attraction ones, at least for the one (who has been) deceived, i.e. there is a black widow or black widower effect. -- David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “‘And if I shed a tear I won’t cage it/I won’t fear love And if I feel a rage I won’t deny it/I won’t fear love" (Sarah McLachlan)