Re: Joni Mitchell is straight-type-2 female

David Dalton <[email protected]> Thu, 05 May 2022 03:43:30 -0230
Newsgroups alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip, alt.celebrities, alt.music, rec.music.misc, alt.rock-n-roll
Organization Eternal September
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On May 3, 2022, David Dalton wrote
(in article<[email protected]>):

> I am the latest avatar type, and my primary siddhi has been matchmaking,
> whereas that of Jesus was probably healing. I have had two accurate
> matchmaking periods, from March 8--20, 2019, and from April 9 to
> July 2, 2021. My related Eight Sexual Harmonics theory is summarized on
> https://www.nfld.com//~dalton/8H.html .
>
> In 2019 I intuited that Joni Michell is straight-type-2-F (female compatible
> and orgasmic up close only with bims, i.e. males attracted to both genders)
> and that two possible matches for her are Tom Waits and Bill Clinton.
>
> I also intuited that she had an old lock (a bond between her and a bim
> or bimT, spiritually bim in female form, that formed earlier in her
> life by electric/warming compatible touch and powerful eye contact,
> not necessarily at the same time, which would have meant that
> she could not be involved with another bim without the permission
> of her primary bim or bimT). This old lock should have been
> dissolved recently so she should now be able to get bims who she
> is attracted to. But if it has not been dissolved she would still need
> to get that permission.
>
> What about her possible matches to bims (males attracted to
> both genders, not necessarily having sex with both genders)
> Tom Waits and/or Bill Clinton (note that I said that straight-type-1-F
> Hillary Clinton is compatible e.g.. with straight-type-1-M Garth Brooks)?
> Both have been partially compatible (less than optimally compatible
> and less likely to stick) with their spouses. However this is
> complicated by the fact that Goddess (who many call God)
> has recently made 60.6% of committed relationships more
> ((usually optimally) sexually compatible. If Tom and Kathleen
> have been made optimally sexually compatible then Tom is
> not available for Joni. If Bill and Hillary have been made optimally
> sexually compatible then Bill is not available for Joni. And even
> if Tom and Kathleen and Bill and Hillary are still partially
> compatible they may decide to stick together. But if there
> has been abuse in their relationships they may have been
> split across species boundaries in the species split and
> would no longer be compatible.
>
> Actually in 2019 I didn’t divine Kathleen’s sexual harmonic(s)
> and if she is bimT (like Billy Joel’s wife, Billy is bim and
> they are compatible e.g. with straight-type-2-F Gwyneth Paltrow,
> who also had an old lock) then both she and Tom are compatible
> with Joni. If Kathleen is gayT then there can be a bridged
> relationship of Joni--Tom--Kathleen.
>
> But regardless of the possible match to Tom Waits and/or
> Bill Clinton, Joni Mitchell should now be able to get
> bims (males attracted to both genders) who she is
> attracted to, unless the permission I mentioned above
> is still needed. Note that straight-type-2 females
> with an old lock may have identified as asexual
> and straight-type-2 males with an old lock (e.g.
> Chris Isaak) may have identified as incel.

The old locks have not yet been dissolved but I hope they
will be soon (those which have lasted at least three years).
If you are interested in further progress, which I deem more
likely if you notice effects, see my thread
“leading up to Mother’s Day/D-moon”
on alt.religion.druid .

Thanks for reading.

a D.

-- 
David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
“‘And if I shed a tear I won’t cage it/I won’t fear love
And if I feel a rage I won’t deny it/I won’t fear love" (Sarah McLachlan)