Re: Joni Mitchell is straight-type-2 female
David Dalton <[email protected]> Thu, 05 May 2022 03:43:30 -0230
| Newsgroups | alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip, alt.celebrities, alt.music, rec.music.misc, alt.rock-n-roll |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eternal September |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 3, 2022, David Dalton wrote (in article<[email protected]>): > I am the latest avatar type, and my primary siddhi has been matchmaking, > whereas that of Jesus was probably healing. I have had two accurate > matchmaking periods, from March 8--20, 2019, and from April 9 to > July 2, 2021. My related Eight Sexual Harmonics theory is summarized on > https://www.nfld.com//~dalton/8H.html . > > In 2019 I intuited that Joni Michell is straight-type-2-F (female compatible > and orgasmic up close only with bims, i.e. males attracted to both genders) > and that two possible matches for her are Tom Waits and Bill Clinton. > > I also intuited that she had an old lock (a bond between her and a bim > or bimT, spiritually bim in female form, that formed earlier in her > life by electric/warming compatible touch and powerful eye contact, > not necessarily at the same time, which would have meant that > she could not be involved with another bim without the permission > of her primary bim or bimT). This old lock should have been > dissolved recently so she should now be able to get bims who she > is attracted to. But if it has not been dissolved she would still need > to get that permission. > > What about her possible matches to bims (males attracted to > both genders, not necessarily having sex with both genders) > Tom Waits and/or Bill Clinton (note that I said that straight-type-1-F > Hillary Clinton is compatible e.g.. with straight-type-1-M Garth Brooks)? > Both have been partially compatible (less than optimally compatible > and less likely to stick) with their spouses. However this is > complicated by the fact that Goddess (who many call God) > has recently made 60.6% of committed relationships more > ((usually optimally) sexually compatible. If Tom and Kathleen > have been made optimally sexually compatible then Tom is > not available for Joni. If Bill and Hillary have been made optimally > sexually compatible then Bill is not available for Joni. And even > if Tom and Kathleen and Bill and Hillary are still partially > compatible they may decide to stick together. But if there > has been abuse in their relationships they may have been > split across species boundaries in the species split and > would no longer be compatible. > > Actually in 2019 I didn’t divine Kathleen’s sexual harmonic(s) > and if she is bimT (like Billy Joel’s wife, Billy is bim and > they are compatible e.g. with straight-type-2-F Gwyneth Paltrow, > who also had an old lock) then both she and Tom are compatible > with Joni. If Kathleen is gayT then there can be a bridged > relationship of Joni--Tom--Kathleen. > > But regardless of the possible match to Tom Waits and/or > Bill Clinton, Joni Mitchell should now be able to get > bims (males attracted to both genders) who she is > attracted to, unless the permission I mentioned above > is still needed. Note that straight-type-2 females > with an old lock may have identified as asexual > and straight-type-2 males with an old lock (e.g. > Chris Isaak) may have identified as incel. The old locks have not yet been dissolved but I hope they will be soon (those which have lasted at least three years). If you are interested in further progress, which I deem more likely if you notice effects, see my thread “leading up to Mother’s Day/D-moon” on alt.religion.druid . Thanks for reading. a D. -- David Dalton [email protected] https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “‘And if I shed a tear I won’t cage it/I won’t fear love And if I feel a rage I won’t deny it/I won’t fear love" (Sarah McLachlan)