Re: Apple agrees to settle class action in US over throttling- $500M.
Arlen Holder <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:40:40 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,rec.photo.digital,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mixmin |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
UPDATE: o Yet another set of lawsuits won against Apple's lawyers, admittedly the best on the planet - and yet - they still lose $113M USD (because Apple secretly purposefully shortened the life of iPhones) <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/esbnfB6OSmc> See also: o Apple to pay $113 million to settle state investigation into throttling <https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/18/apple-fine-battery/> o Apple agrees to pay $500M for purposefully secretly slowing down iPhones <https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/apple-agrees-to-pay-iphone-owners-in-settlement-over-slowing-down-older-models/2020/03/02/c026789c-5c9d-11ea-9055-5fa12981bbbf_story.html> o Apple admitted to the crime of purposefully secretly shortening iPhone life <https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/dgccrf/presse/communique/2020/CP-Ralentissement-fonctionnement-iPhone200207.pdf> -- Apologists hate facts! > UPDATE: > > o *Loss of privacy: Google+ users entitled to small cash amount based on settlement* > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/LdDMSwt0NVE> > > *Google users only get $12 but Apple iPhone owners get _double_ that!* > o How to submit your claim in Apple's half a billion dollar secret throtting settlement > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/wm-8YUKl5M0> > > *Some countries are asking for more than double that even!* > o Five countries want Apple to pay consumers more money to settle secret throttling of iPhone CPUs to purposefully shorten device life > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/YKId-GJCdec> > > *Android owners won't get much as Google doesn't pull those Apple tricks:* > o Do any Android phone manufacturers throttle (CPUs, PD Charging, Modems) like Apple consistently does? > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/ZTmmGoAndyM> > > In France, the prosecutors office also received $27M USD in criminal files > from Apple forcing Apple to publicly admit the committed the crime of > secretly and intentionally knowingly shortening the life of iPhones: > o Apple agrees to pay 25 million euros fine as Apple admits > "Apple committed the crime of deceptive commercial practice by omission" > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/l6gAjvW6aqQ> > > REFERENCES: > o BBC: *Apple fined for slowing down old iPhones* > <https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51413724> > > o *France Fines Apple $27 Million for Slowing Down Old iPhones* > <https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/02/11/france-fines-apple-41-million-for-slowing-down-old-iphones/> > > o *Apple Fined 25 Million Euros in France for Slowing Down Older iPhones With iOS Update* > <https://www.macrumors.com/2020/02/07/apple-fined-25m-euros-france-slowing-down-iphones/> > > o *Apple fined $41 million for secretly slowing old iPhones* > <https://www.smh.com.au/technology/apple-fined-41-million-for-secretly-slowing-old-iphones-20200210-p53z9n.html> > > And, given Apologists brazenly deny what Apple openly admits, > here are screenshots from those sites backing up the facts: > o <https://i.postimg.cc/BQZ9hZg1/crime00.jpg> > o <https://i.postimg.cc/d11sJLYJ/crime02.jpg> > o <https://i.postimg.cc/HnL1QKxH/crime03.jpg> > o <https://i.postimg.cc/jjkFp5dV/crime04.jpg> > o <https://i.postimg.cc/rszF8z5S/crime05.jpg> > > What the apologists do is play silly semantic games trying to claim that a > criminal offense and a criminal fine to the criminal system is "not" a > crime, simply by creative use of their personal translation of French law. > > Why do apologist deny what even Apple publicly admitted? > o And why do apologists always blame Google/Microsoft for what Apple does? > > I don't know why, but I suspect they brazenly deny facts simply because... > o Apologists hate that Apple isn't what MARKETING highly sold them it was. On Sat, 16 May 2020 08:47:27 +0545, Arlen Holder wrote: > UPDATE: > o /Apple's Plan to Pay $500 Million to Settle Lawsuit/ > /Over Secretly Throttling Older iPhones/ > /Gets Preliminary Approval today/ > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/jN-h4WvWTEA> > > *FACTS* > o I broke the news to this newsgroup about throttling, not the apologists. > > *FACTS* > This is the 1st thread that broke the news of the _secret_ CPU throttling: > o *Report says Apple 'Powerd' code secretly slows your iOS device down to trick you into buying a new device* > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/GdEtzzrc9F0/z57KTsmWAQAJ> > > *FACTS* > o Every subsequent major release from Apple contains _more_ throttling! > > *ASSESSMENT* > o $500M is cheap for Apple to now throttle any phone it ever wants to! > > Yippee! This is great for Apple! > -- > What's not surprising is how brilliant Apple MARKETING is; what's > surprising is how gullible the typical Apple consumer appears to be.