Re: Apple agrees to settle class action in US over throttling- $500M.
Arlen Holder <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:05:05 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,rec.photo.digital,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mixmin |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The facts show you'd be hard pressed to find any mobile device more poorly designed than the bulk of today's iPhones... Simply because most iPhones _require_ throttling just to prevent them from prematurely being unstable. You get the unenviable choice: a. *CHOOSE UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE*, or, b. *CHOOSE UNACCEPTABLE STABILITY* You must choose one. Verbatim, because apologists hate facts, so they deny any and all facts they simply _hate_ about Apple products (which is a hell of a lot of facts) "Apple 'fully understood' that by concealing the issues, it could spend a year profiting off of people who thought they needed to buy a new iPhone, when they only really needed to replace their phone's battery to avoid [premature] throttling or unexpected [premature] shutdowns." o Apple will pay $113 million for throttling iPhones <https://www.theverge.com/2020/11/18/21573710/apple-battery-gate-throttle-iphones-settlement-amount> -- It's hard to find a mobile device more poorly designed than the iPhone is.