Re: Fastest Mobile Networks 2021

On 2021-10-06 12:58, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
> Am 06.10.21 um 18:52 schrieb Alan Browne:
>> On 2021-10-05 13:29, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>> Am 05.10.21 um 19:16 schrieb Alan Browne:
>>>> On 2021-10-05 02:51, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
>>>>> Am 05.10.21 um 08:38 schrieb NewsKrawler:
>>>>>> Fastest Mobile Networks 2021
>>>>>> https://www.pcmag.com/news/fastest-mobile-networks-2021
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For our 12th annual test, we drove more than 10,000 miles, speed-testing
>>>>>> AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon 4G and 5G in cities, towns, and rural regions
>>>>>> all over the US. We found a radically new landscape−and a surprising winner.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is utter bullshit and at best a tiny little bit of anecdotal evidence.
>>>>
>>>> Given their test method and presented data it is certainly not anecdotal.
>>>
>>>
>>> It certainly is.
>>
>> Look up what an "anecdote" is and get back to us.
> 
> "Andecdotal evidence" is a terminus technicus. Come back when you

1) You're casting it as anecdotal evidence.

Definition of anecdote.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/anecdote

> figured out what that is. Being precise the PC-Mag-survey is not even that.

The PC Mag survey sampled information in many places and published the 
data and the reduction of same.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/fastest-mobile-networks-2021#our-testing-methodology

Not anecdotal.

-- 
"...there are many humorous things in this world; among them the white
  man's notion that he is less savage than the other savages."
                                             -Samuel Clemens