Re: Maps to Compare AT&T, T-Mobile, US Cellular, & Verizon Mobile Coverage and US State of the Mobile Union 1H 2021
Robin Goodfellow <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Oct 2021 17:15:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | Keeping Good Company |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
nospam <[email protected]> asked > same for at&t and verizon. coverage in the santa cruz mountains is very > spotty, no matter what carrier. I agree with nospam and I _live_ in the Santa Cruz Mountains so I'd know. I have no reason to shill for any carrier, whether Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mo. Up here, there isn't even cable so we get even our Wi-Fi from miles away. While Snit and Jolly Roger don't know the difference between megabits per second versus decibels, I do, where these are my numbers on T-Mobile. With my in-home cellular towers and in-home cellular repeater turned off... My speed is 100 Mbps to 300 Mpbs on T-Mobile in the Santa Cruz Mountains. <https://i.postimg.cc/zf9w1tGZ/speedtest07.jpg> My signal Strength is -90 to -100 decibels (RSRP) in the same mountains. <https://i.postimg.cc/xCbVQ2pj/signal02.jpg> What's important to note is that a lot of my neighbors are on AT&T and Verizon in addition to T-Mobile where _all_ have in-home cellular towers. More to the point, we know _exactly_ where the cellular towers are (they don't hide them you know) where the closest ones are all clustered together. What sms is claiming doesn't make sense and I _live_ in those SC Mountains. How does Verizon "magically" get signal without any nearby towers doing it? From a satellite?