Re: Maps to Compare AT&T, T-Mobile, US Cellular, & Verizon Mobile Coverage and US State of the Mobile Union 1H 2021

Robin Goodfellow wrote:

>nospam <[email protected]> asked
>> same for at&t and verizon. coverage in the santa cruz mountains is
>>very  spotty, no matter what carrier.
>
>I agree with nospam and I live in the Santa Cruz Mountains so I'd
>know.  I have no reason to shill for any carrier, whether Verizon,
>AT&T, or T-Mo.
>
>Up here, there isn't even cable so we get even our Wi-Fi from miles
>away.
>
>While Snit and Jolly Roger don't know the difference between megabits
>per second versus decibels, I do, where these are my numbers on
>T-Mobile.
>
>With my in-home cellular towers and in-home cellular repeater turned
>off...
>
>My speed is 100 Mbps to 300 Mpbs on T-Mobile in the Santa Cruz
>Mountains.   <https://i.postimg.cc/zf9w1tGZ/speedtest07.jpg>
>
>My signal Strength is -90 to -100 decibels (RSRP) in the same
>mountains.   <https://i.postimg.cc/xCbVQ2pj/signal02.jpg>
>
>What's important to note is that a lot of my neighbors are on AT&T and
>Verizon in addition to T-Mobile where all have in-home cellular
>towers.
>
>More to the point, we know exactly where the cellular towers are (they
>don't hide them you know) where the closest ones are all clustered
>together.
>
>What sms is claiming doesn't make sense and I live in those SC
>Mountains.
>
>How does Verizon "magically" get signal without any nearby towers
>doing it?  From a satellite?


I don't think sms cares what your T-Mobile 5G signal looks like because
it's not Verizon LTE.