Re: 5G map
Andy Burnelli <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:30:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
sms wrote: >>>> Here's an Ookla screenshot from 4/2: <https://i.imgur.com/qnPy2ss.png> >>>> Here's an Ookla screenshot from 4/4: <https://i.imgur.com/ecWtkOC.png> >>> >>> At least we were able to force Steve to act like an adult and post his >>> reports instead of just typing them in - which I consider a success. >> >> Just not moved enough to apologize for calling him a liar... > > Whatever. I understand how some people get very upset when confronted > with facts that they don't like. Steve, I do not apologize for calling you a liar on the FCC coverage maps. But I do openly apologize to you for saying you made up these figures: 306 Mbps down, upload 23.7 Mbps, Ping 13ms, Jitter 1.5ms 245 Mbps down, upload 35.1 Mbps, Ping 38ms, Jitter 1.6ms I'll believe those figures (I didn't check if they're what you typed). I don't really care about Verizon, T-Mobile or AT&T. Why would I care about any carrier? Nobody cares. Except you. I am not beholden to _any_ narrative when it comes to the carriers. I don't think anyone (other than you) is either. If you prove your statements, I'm fine with them no matter what they are. Simple. Just prove what you say. How hard is that?