Re: 5G map

Andy Burnelli wrote:
> sms wrote:
> 
>>>>> Here's an Ookla screenshot from 4/2: 
>>>>> <https://i.imgur.com/qnPy2ss.png>
>>>>> Here's an Ookla screenshot from 4/4: 
>>>>> <https://i.imgur.com/ecWtkOC.png>
>>>>
>>>> At least we were able to force Steve to act like an adult and 
>>>> post his
>>>> reports instead of just typing them in - which I consider a 
>>>> success.
>>>
>>> Just not moved enough to apologize for calling him a liar...
>>
>> Whatever. I understand how some people get very upset when 
>> confronted with facts that they don't like.
> 
> Steve,
> I do not apologize for calling you a liar on the FCC coverage maps.
> 
> But I do openly apologize to you for saying you made up these figures:
> 306 Mbps down, upload 23.7 Mbps, Ping 13ms, Jitter 1.5ms
> 245 Mbps down, upload 35.1 Mbps, Ping 38ms, Jitter 1.6ms
> 
> I'll believe those figures (I didn't check if they're what you typed).
> I don't really care about Verizon, T-Mobile or AT&T.
> Why would I care about any carrier?
> Nobody cares. Except you.
> 
> I am not beholden to _any_ narrative when it comes to the carriers.
> I don't think anyone (other than you) is either.
> 
> If you prove your statements, I'm fine with them no matter what 
> they are.
> Simple.
> 
> Just prove what you say. How hard is that?
> 

Do you plan on providing proof along with everything you post in 
the future?

That would go a long way to convince people you are an intelligent 
adult. I look forward to it.