Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

Gabx wrote:
> Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
> > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
> > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted some
> > > > > news:[email protected]:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different [Spam].
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to destroy groups
> > > > > > and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to counter the
> > > > > > jerk.
> > > > > 
> > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
> > > > > 
> > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
> > > > 
> > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
> > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
> > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
> > 
> >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
> > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
> > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
> > 
> Prove it by code !

I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and
defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have
something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time
for coding, only time for propaganda.

Regards
Stefan

-- 
https://tilde.club/~pollux/