Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 26 Oct 2025, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
>> Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:
>>> Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>>> > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>>> > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted
>>> > > > some news:[email protected]:
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>>> > > > > [Spam]. 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>>> > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use
>>> > > > > YAMN / neodome to counter the jerk.
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.  
>>> > > > 
>>> > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>>> > > 
>>> > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>>> > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>>> > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>>> > > 
>>> > 
>>> > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>>> 
>>>   We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>>> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>>> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>>> 
>> 
>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your
>> eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or
>> you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII
>> 'anonymous' remailing. 
> 
> It all works with Tor.   No Tor, no work.  

That's right. +1