Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 26 Oct 2025, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-
202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> posted some 
news:[email protected]:

> Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some
>>news:[email protected]: 
>>
>>> Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:
>>>> Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>>>> > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>>>> > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted
>>>> > > > some news:[email protected]:
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>>>> > > > > [Spam]. 
>>>> > > > > 
>>>> > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>>>> > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN
>>>> > > > > / neodome to counter the jerk.
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.  
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>>>> > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>>>> > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>>>> > > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>>>> 
>>>>   We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>>>> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>>>> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your
>>> eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or
>>> you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII
>>> 'anonymous' remailing. 
>>
>>It all works with Tor.   No Tor, no work.  
> 
> Remailers don't need Tor at all.  Tor was developed long after the
> invention of anonymous remailing in order to have something similar for
> from the anonymity perspective inherently problematic real-time (web)
> communication.

Tor was conceived and developed in the early / mid '90s.  

Anonymous remailers emerged 92-94.

> You send some packets to the entry remailer and nobody can figure out
> which mail message at some exit remailer they represent, if any, as you
> just may have sent dummy packets. That isn't pseudonymity, it's true
> anonymity no matter what shithead Claas tells you.

Irrelevant.  There are other means to identify who sent something.