Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

Yamn2 Remailer wrote:
> Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Gabx wrote:
> > > Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> > > > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
> > > > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
> > > > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted some
> > > > > > > news:[email protected]:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different [Spam].
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to destroy groups
> > > > > > > > and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to counter the
> > > > > > > > jerk.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
> > > > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
> > > > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
> > > > 
> > > >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
> > > > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
> > > > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
> > > > 
> > > Prove it by code !
> > 
> > I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and
> > defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have
> > something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time
> > for coding, only time for propaganda.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Stefan
> 
> Claas, when will you answer the questions asked in MID
> <[email protected]>
> and <[email protected]>, which would
> make it easier to tell who's the propagandist here and
> who's not?
> 

<[email protected]>
> Worse - Pool size 1000 messages with a latency of no more that 20
> minutes?  Where in the world will these 3k messages per hour come from?

1000 was an assumption when it get very popular in the next couple
of years. Now it is 400.

> Worse - IYO, ok.  And how will the user be sure all of them are run by
> different operators, when, on top of that, they hide their identities
> behind .onion services?

First of all, some Mixmaster and YAMN remops are only known to TLAs
and LEA, but not to the community. The Onion Courier Mixnet is primarily
intended for private use, so that families and friends can communicate
anonymously and decentralized. A super big advantage over old TypeII,
as one only need a little Raspberry Pi attached to his router and there
is no learning curve, Domain registration and VPS registration required.

<[email protected]>
> So a simple question: Is he right?

You should have learned that I am a honest person, which many people
hate, due to the innovative privacy things I do, which are much better
than 30 years old tech, like Mixmaster and GnuPG, for example. And most
important, I am an Eurasia patriot, which of course U.S. Democrats and
EU leftist eco facists hate, hence the attacks on me. ;-)

Regards
Stefan

-- 
https://tilde.club/~pollux/