Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 27 Oct 2025, Anonymous User <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> Stefan Claas wrote:
>>Yamn2 Remailer wrote:
>>> Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Gabx wrote:
>>> > > Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>>> > > > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>>> > > > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>>> > > > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]>
>>> > > > > > > posted some 
>>> > > > > > > news:[email protected]: 
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam]
>>> > > > > > > > different [Spam]. 
>>> > > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole
>>> > > > > > > > to destroy groups and services for all, but not okay
>>> > > > > > > > to use YAMN / neodome to counter the 
>>> > > > > > > > jerk.
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
>>> > > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>>> > > > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>>> > > > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>>> > > > > > 
>>> > > > > 
>>> > > > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet
>>> > > > > users? 
>>> > > > 
>>> > > >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX
>>> > > >    are the 
>>> > > > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most
>>> > > > basic principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to
>>> > > > your victims. 
>>> > > > 
>>> > > Prove it by code !
>>> > 
>>> > I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc.
>>> > and defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to
>>> > have something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So
>>> > no time for coding, only time for propaganda.
>>> > 
>>> > Regards
>>> > Stefan
>>> 
>>> Claas, when will you answer the questions asked in MID
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> and <[email protected]>, which would
>>> make it easier to tell who's the propagandist here and
>>> who's not?
>>> 
>>
>><[email protected]>
>>> Worse - Pool size 1000 messages with a latency of no more that 20
>>> minutes?  Where in the world will these 3k messages per hour come
>>> from? 
>>
>>1000 was an assumption when it get very popular in the next couple
>>of years. Now it is 400.
>>
>>> Worse - IYO, ok.  And how will the user be sure all of them are run
>>> by different operators, when, on top of that, they hide their
>>> identities behind .onion services?
>>
>>First of all, some Mixmaster and YAMN remops are only known to TLAs
>>and LEA, but not to the community. The Onion Courier Mixnet is
>>primarily intended for private use, so that families and friends can
>>communicate anonymously and decentralized. A super big advantage over
>>old TypeII, as one only need a little Raspberry Pi attached to his
>>router and there is no learning curve, Domain registration and VPS
>>registration required. 
>>
>><[email protected]>
>>> So a simple question: Is he right?
> 
> Yes, he is in each and every respect!
> 
>>
>>You should have learned that I am a honest person
> 
> ... who continues to avoid answering the key questions raised
> by the articles mentioned above that unmask his flawed hacks.

He has good ideas and acts on them proving concept.