Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

Stefan Claas wrote:
>Yamn2 Remailer wrote:
>> Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Gabx wrote:
>> > > Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>> > > > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>> > > > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>> > > > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted some
>> > > > > > > news:[email protected]:
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different [Spam].
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to destroy groups
>> > > > > > > > and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to counter the
>> > > > > > > > jerk.
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>> > > > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>> > > > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>> > > > 
>> > > >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>> > > > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>> > > > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>> > > > 
>> > > Prove it by code !
>> > 
>> > I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and
>> > defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have
>> > something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time
>> > for coding, only time for propaganda.
>> > 
>> > Regards
>> > Stefan
>> 
>> Claas, when will you answer the questions asked in MID
>> <[email protected]>
>> and <[email protected]>, which would
>> make it easier to tell who's the propagandist here and
>> who's not?
>> 
>
><[email protected]>
>> Worse - Pool size 1000 messages with a latency of no more that 20
>> minutes?  Where in the world will these 3k messages per hour come from?
>
>1000 was an assumption when it get very popular in the next couple
>of years. Now it is 400.
>
>> Worse - IYO, ok.  And how will the user be sure all of them are run by
>> different operators, when, on top of that, they hide their identities
>> behind .onion services?
>
>First of all, some Mixmaster and YAMN remops are only known to TLAs
>and LEA, but not to the community. The Onion Courier Mixnet is primarily
>intended for private use, so that families and friends can communicate
>anonymously and decentralized. A super big advantage over old TypeII,
>as one only need a little Raspberry Pi attached to his router and there
>is no learning curve, Domain registration and VPS registration required.
>
><[email protected]>
>> So a simple question: Is he right?

Yes, he is in each and every respect!

>
>You should have learned that I am a honest person

... who continues to avoid answering the key questions raised
by the articles mentioned above that unmask his flawed hacks.