Re: Worst Translation of the Bible? (DeepSeek)
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.christnet.christianlife,alt.christnet.christnews,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian |
|---|---|
| Organization | ViperNews - www.vipernews.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
jimmy alpha GeD <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 9/2/2026 8:34 PM, Christ Rose wrote: > > it has to be the one sightwalker is reading, if it had a good Bible > being as smart as it thinks it is, sightwalker would know better... > >> I asked DeepSeek what's the worst English translation of the Bible, >> and why? Here is the response: >> >> The Problem of Theological Bias >> >> Many scholars argue that some translations are not objective >> renderings of the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek manuscripts but are >> instead designed to support the particular doctrines of their >> translators. >> >> The New World Translation (NWT), produced by the Jehovah's Witnesses, >> is a primary example. Critics point to the fact that its translators >> are anonymous and that it has been accused of altering key passages >> to align with Jehovah's Witnesses' theology—for instance, by adding >> words that aren't in the original text to change the meaning. This >> lack of transparency and the consistent pattern of changes to support >> a specific doctrine lead many to view it as a poor translation. >> > > "Everything you know about your Jesus is from a translation, everything I know about Muhammed is from the same Arabic I speak" Hard to argue with that...........