Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

On Mar 4, 10:06 am, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 8:58 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Evolution is science. Creation, and its deriviatives are religion. We
> > teach science in public schools and not religion. This is not
> > complicated.
>
> Don't teach either. Then no controversy. Let the student decide
> whether he or she wants to learn about evolution when he or she goes
> to college.
>
> Oh, free choice.  Can't have that now.

I wouldn't want my kids to have a choice as to whether they're taught
in a science class that the universe is 6000-odd years old, or that it
is 13.7 billion years old. If they're taught the former in a religion
class in a church, I'm willing to say, "Oh. Ok."; but not if it's in a
science class in a public school. "Creation science" and "Intelligent
design science" are not science, and I don't want them taught in
science classes. So sue me.