Re: Kurtsie Nicklas, squat-to-piss faggot, advocating "military servicing"

On 5/31/2021 8:14 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 08:09:52 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/31/2021 7:54 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:03:35 -0700, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/30/2021 7:23 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/30/21 2:25 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 6:35 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is at the tome of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation
>>>>>>>> website:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "When one proudly dons a U.S. Military Uniform, there is only one
>>>>>>>> religious symbol: The U.S. Flag. There is only one religious
>>>>>>>> scripture: the American Constitution. Finally, there is only one
>>>>>>>> faith: American patriotism."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would seem that they are int he business of destroying the First
>>>>>>>> Amendment, rather than defending it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, that's exactly wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        The Military Religious Freedom Foundation is dedicated to
>>>>>>>     ensuring
>>>>>>> that all
>>>>>>>        members of the United States Armed Forces fully receive the
>>>>>>> Constitutional
>>>>>>>        guarantees of religious freedom to which they and all Americans
>>>>>>>     are
>>>>>>> entitled
>>>>>>>        by virtue of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        MRFF recognizes that military life requires individual
>>>>>>>     adherence to
>>>>>>> shared
>>>>>>>        patriotic principles. MRFF also recognizes the need for
>>>>>>>     military
>>>>>>> personnel to
>>>>>>>        at times temporarily relinquish some Constitutionally granted
>>>>>>>     personal    freedoms for the sake of military discipline and
>>>>>>>     objectives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        However, MRFF believes that religious faith is a
>>>>>>>     Constitutionally
>>>>>>> guaranteed
>>>>>>>        freedom that must never be compromised, except in the most
>>>>>>>     limited of    military circumstances, because of its fundamental
>>>>>>>     importance to the    preservation of the American nation and the
>>>>>>>     American way of life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        Additionally, MRFF adheres strongly to the principle that
>>>>>>>     religious
>>>>>>> faith is
>>>>>>>        a deeply personal matter, and that no American has the right to
>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>        another American’s beliefs as long as they do not unwontedly
>>>>>>>     intrude
>>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>        public space or the privacy or safety of another individual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        https://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/about/our-mission/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are staunch, stalwart defenders of the first amendment against
>>>>>>> the attacks on it by theocratic Taliban-like extremists like you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet they seem to thrive on restricting the religious exercise of
>>>>>> military members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        "Military members" AGREE to sacrifice their
>>>>> religious obligations when enlisting.
>>>>>
>>>>>        "I cannot obey that order sir, this is my
>>>>> Sabbath". See how far THAT goes............
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The MRFF (not "MRRF," as Hartung stupidly and incorrectly put it), has not
>>>> restricted the religious liberty of anyone in the military, nor have they
>>>> advocated for any restriction of religious liberty.
>>>
>>> "MRFF has..." then "MRFF have..."
>>
>> Referring to the people in the MRFF, of course...
> 
> HAHAHAHA. You're 

I am your intellectual, moral and physical superior.  Yes.


> 
>> I could just as well have been referring to the organization, of course. It's
>> common British usage.  "Ford have introduced two new SUV models..."
> 
> Not in the same post you can't!

Oh, but I can, and I *did*!

And you'll take it and like it, you rancid mackerel-reeking cunt.

Have you serviced the Burlington PD this morning?