Re: Another example of government overreach

On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the USDA, saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of his fields. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled that a seasonal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal law as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its designation of his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new evidence to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the determination. Now Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says the agency is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and other federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>          We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>          Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>          Never mind...............
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck:  "...designation of his mud puddle as a protected 
>>>>>>>>>> wetland in
>>>>>>>>>> 2020."  Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the sneering 
>>>>>>>>>> derogatory
>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle."  It wasn't a "mud puddle."  It was 0.8 acre of marshland.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is not suing 
>>>>>>>>>> because the
>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland.  He used it for 
>>>>>>>>>> farmland, and
>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the crops he 
>>>>>>>>>> grew at a
>>>>>>>>>> loss.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive misrepresentation 
>>>>>>>>>> of what
>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is.  You always lie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I found it on my own.  Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl / Bit of
>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it.  You do it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be killed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign
>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - *absolutely*
>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang."
>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob.
>>>>>
>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020.  You lied, blowjob.
>>>>
>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed.  At the time of
>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president.
>>>
>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944
>>
>> Your concession of defeat is noted.
> 
> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand firmly against 
> capital punishment.

Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation.