Re: Another example of government overreach

Kurt Nicklas <[email protected]> Mon, 31 May 2021 20:18:21 +0300
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.comedy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:12:29 -0500, David Hartung
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 5/31/21 12:07 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>> On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USDA, saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his fields. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that a seasonal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designation of his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determination. Now Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and other 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Never mind...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck:  "...designation of his mud puddle as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> protected wetland in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020."  Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sneering derogatory
>>>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle."  It wasn't a "mud puddle."  It was 0.8 acre of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> marshland.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> suing because the
>>>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland.  He used it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for farmland, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> crops he grew at a
>>>>>>>>>>>> loss.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive 
>>>>>>>>>>>> misrepresentation of what
>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is.  You always lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I found it on my own.  Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl / 
>>>>>>>>>> Bit of
>>>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it.  You do it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be killed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign
>>>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - *absolutely*
>>>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang."
>>>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020.  You lied, blowjob.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed.  At 
>>>>>> the time of
>>>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944
>>>>
>>>> Your concession of defeat is noted.
>>>
>>> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand firmly 
>>> against capital punishment.
>> 
>> Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation.
>
>Interesting. You would execute Donald trump on a false charge of 
>treason, but not one who has been convicted of a heinous crime in which 
>there is zero doubt of the man's guilt. You are truly a piece of work.

Of course, it's not only Trump that he wants killed:

"It is deeply regrettable that more of the violent criminal mob
weren't gunned down.  Next time, they will be."  
---Rudy Canoza, 2/22/21

Actually, I'm betting that the dwarf has fantasies of killing you and
me. 

Stay tuned...