Re: Another example of government overreach

Bill Flett <[email protected]> Mon, 31 May 2021 10:35:36 -0700
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.comedy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/31/2021 10:18 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 12:12:29 -0500, David Hartung
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/31/21 12:07 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>> On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USDA, saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his fields. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that a seasonal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designation of his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determination. Now Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           Never mind...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck:  "...designation of his mud puddle as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected wetland in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020."  Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sneering derogatory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle."  It wasn't a "mud puddle."  It was 0.8 acre of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suing because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland.  He used it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for farmland, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crops he grew at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loss.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive
>>>>>>>>>>>>> misrepresentation of what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is.  You always lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I found it on my own.  Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl /
>>>>>>>>>>> Bit of
>>>>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it.  You do it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be killed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign
>>>>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - *absolutely*
>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang."
>>>>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020.  You lied, blowjob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed.  At
>>>>>>> the time of
>>>>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944
>>>>>
>>>>> Your concession of defeat is noted.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand firmly
>>>> against capital punishment.
>>>
>>> Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation.
>>
>> Interesting. You would execute Donald trump on a false charge of
>> treason, but not one who has been convicted of a heinous crime in which
>> there is zero doubt of the man's guilt. You are truly a piece of work.
> 
> Of course, it's not only Trump that he wants killed:
> 
> "It is deeply regrettable that more of the violent criminal mob
> weren't gunned down.  Next time, they will be."
> ---Rudy Canoza, 2/22/21

I am right about that.