Re: Another example of government overreach
Kurt Nicklas <[email protected]> Mon, 31 May 2021 20:42:44 +0300
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.comedy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 31 May 2021 10:32:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]> wrote: >On 5/31/2021 10:12 AM, David Hartung wrote: >> On 5/31/21 12:07 PM, Bill Flett wrote: >>> On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote: >>>> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote: >>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the USDA, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled that a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seasonal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal law as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its designation of his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new evidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the determination. Now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says the agency is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and other federal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Never mind............... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck: "...designation of his mud puddle as a protected >>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland in >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020." Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the sneering >>>>>>>>>>>>> derogatory >>>>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle." It wasn't a "mud puddle." It was 0.8 acre of marshland. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is not suing >>>>>>>>>>>>> because the >>>>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland. He used it for >>>>>>>>>>>>> farmland, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the crops he >>>>>>>>>>>>> grew at a >>>>>>>>>>>>> loss. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive misrepresentation >>>>>>>>>>>>> of what >>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is. You always lie. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I found it on my own. Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl / Bit of >>>>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it. You do it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be killed: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign >>>>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - *absolutely* >>>>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang." >>>>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020. You lied, blowjob. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed. At the >>>>>>> time of >>>>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944 >>>>> >>>>> Your concession of defeat is noted. >>>> >>>> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand firmly >>>> against capital punishment. >>> >>> Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation. >> >> Interesting. You would execute Donald trump on a false charge of treason > >No. Trump absolutely has betrayed the United States: the country and the >Constitution. It is not a false charge. You know this. Dwarfie begins to pathetically walk back his call for the death of Trump. >I was exaggerating for effect in saying I would support the execution of Trump >for treason. > I oppose capital punishment categorically. However, if death *is* >a punishment for treason, then if anyone ever deserved to be executed for >treason, it is Trump. Dwarfie completes his pathetic walk-back of his call for the death of Trump. Poor dwarfie. That it should come to this!! Hahahah. HAHAHAHA!