Re: Another example of government overreach

On 5/31/21 12:32 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
> On 5/31/2021 10:12 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 5/31/21 12:07 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>> On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USDA, saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his fields. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that a seasonal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal law as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designation of his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determination. Now Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the agency is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Never mind...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck:  "...designation of his mud puddle as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected wetland in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020."  Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sneering derogatory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle."  It wasn't a "mud puddle."  It was 0.8 acre 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of marshland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not suing because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland.  He used it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for farmland, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crops he grew at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loss.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> misrepresentation of what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is.  You always lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I found it on my own.  Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl / 
>>>>>>>>>>> Bit of
>>>>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it.  You do it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be 
>>>>>>>>>> killed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign
>>>>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - 
>>>>>>>>>> *absolutely*
>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang."
>>>>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020.  You lied, blowjob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed.  
>>>>>>> At the time of
>>>>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944
>>>>>
>>>>> Your concession of defeat is noted.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand 
>>>> firmly against capital punishment.
>>>
>>> Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation.
>>
>> Interesting. You would execute Donald trump on a false charge of treason
> 
> No.  Trump absolutely has betrayed the United States:  the country and 
> the Constitution.  It is not a false charge.  You know this.

I know otherwise.

> I was exaggerating for effect in saying I would support the execution of 
> Trump for treason.  I oppose capital punishment categorically.  However, 
> if death *is* a punishment for treason, then if anyone ever deserved to 
> be executed for treason, it is Trump.

Backpedaling again.