Re: Another example of government overreach

On 5/31/2021 2:35 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 5/31/21 12:32 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>> On 5/31/2021 10:12 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 5/31/21 12:07 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/21 11:19 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 9:06 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 09:02:58 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2021 7:52 AM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2021 07:41:44 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 9:01 PM, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:31:07 -0700, Bill Flett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2021 11:14 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/21 11:51 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2021 7:23 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/21 9:03 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.farmprogress.com/regulatory/south-dakota-farmer-sues-usda-o 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver-wetland-restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A third-generation farmer filed a lawsuit against the USDA, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is unlawfully preventing him from farming one of his 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2011, the Natural Resources Conservation Service ruled that a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seasonal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal law as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster requested that the government revisit its designation of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mud puddle as a protected wetland in 2020. Despite new evidence 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrary, the NRCS refused to reconsider the determination. Now 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is suing over the unconstitutional conditions he says the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attaching to his participation in crop insurance and other federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          We need to elect Trump so this kind of thing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Oh, wait - who was president in 2020 again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Never mind...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where in the article is Trump mentioned?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You stupid fuck:  "...designation of his mud puddle as a protected 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wetland in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020."  Who was president in 2020, dumb fuck?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The way we know this story is bullshit is the use of the sneering 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> derogatory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "mud puddle."  It wasn't a "mud puddle."  It was 0.8 acre of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should also note that this dole-scrounging farmer is not suing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRCS prohibited him from using it for farmland.  He used it for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> farmland, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *now* he wants government money for price support for the crops he 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grew at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loss.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is another of your lies, this time by massive 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misrepresentation of what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the actual story is.  You always lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So find and post the "actual story".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I found it on my own.  Your stupid whore ally, Kremlin Girl / Bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothingness, did also and posted a link to it.  You do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just like I found you post calling for the President to be killed:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> " In the sense of betraying the country - betraying it to foreign
>>>>>>>>>>> influence, betraying the country's historical values - *absolutely*
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is a traitor. He should hang."
>>>>>>>>>>> ---Rudy Canoza, 7/29/2020
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump is not the president, blowjob.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You wrote this in 2020, Prof. Canoza
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did not write that on 07/29/2020.  You lied, blowjob.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was not, of course, calling for "the president" to be killed. At the 
>>>>>>>> time of
>>>>>>>> his lawful execution, Trump would not and will not be president.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/4kpth944
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your concession of defeat is noted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting that until the subject of Trump comes up, you stand firmly 
>>>>> against capital punishment.
>>>>
>>>> Treason, particularly by the president, changes the equation.
>>>
>>> Interesting. You would execute Donald trump on a false charge of treason
>>
>> No.  Trump absolutely has betrayed the United States:  the country and the 
>> Constitution.  It is not a false charge.  You know this.
> 
> I know otherwise.

No.  You know what I said you know:  that Trump betrayed the country and the 
Constitution.

> 
>> I was exaggerating for effect in saying I would support the execution of Trump 
>> for treason.  I oppose capital punishment categorically.  However, if death 
>> *is* a punishment for treason, then if anyone ever deserved to be executed for 
>> treason, it is Trump.
> 
> Backpedaling again.

No.