Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

c186282 <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Jul 2026 03:13:06 -0400

Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.magic.secrets,alt.conspiracy
Organization	wokiesux
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 6/30/26 19:45, rbowman wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum effects - get
>>     more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum stuff isn't as
>>     deterministic as bulk matter devices and suffer from the uncertainty
>>     principle.
> 
> Physics was a 4 semester course and the 4th was quantum when it started to
> get weird. On one essay test I wrote about Heisenberg's uncertainty
> principle versus Heidegger's principle uncertainty. Fortunately the
> professor had a sense of humor or maybe he realized how far off the beaten
> path the original quantum guys got when you start thinking about the Being
> of beings.

   Hey, all we need is a "Heisenberg Compensator" :-)

   As for the old Quantum Guys (maybe a few gals) - they
   weren't really WRONG. The calx are the calx. Yea, it's
   a Weird Weird World - nothing sympathetic to the human
   nervous system - but then it's all NOT *ABOUT* US.