Re: "Pending Transaction" feature question
tmp6986 <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:00:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.financial.quicken |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/14/2024 3:40 PM, Andrew wrote: > On 4/14/2024 9:16 AM, tmp6986 wrote: >> On 4/13/2024 3:57 PM, Andrew wrote: >>> So I see that Q now has a new 'Pending Transaction' feature one can >>> turn on. Fortunately, they have the default set to 'OFF'. >>> >>> I am wondering why people would want this given the following three >>> circumstances. >>> >>> 1. A pending transaction often goes away *completely*, such as a hold >>> against a hotel which COMPLETELY gets released if one had pre-paid >>> the hotel without any additional charge applied to your hotel bill. >>> IMO, this type of transaction should not even be displayed in your >>> register since you'll never incur the expenses. >>> >>> 2. A pending transaction is often totally *wrong*, although a >>> legitimate other value you do owe will exist, such as a restaurant >>> charge that did not include your gratuity such that when it does >>> accurately hit your books it will be a different amount. Is Q smart >>> enough to *update* your register with the correct amount? >>> >>> 3. A pending transaction *might* have the wrong date when it actually >>> does hit your Quicken download if Q isn't smart enough to use the >>> 'correct' date. And is that date the date you incurred the pending >>> amount, or when it actually gets posted? That date might be >>> different according to personal preference perhaps. >>> >>> Anyone who uses this feature (And I know John Pollard said he's *not* >>> interested in this, and at the moment, neither am I since these >>> transactions are not real yet, but reflect a *perhaps* future >>> transaction that may or may not even be accurate given the above. >>> >>> I don't know how Q would differentiate #s 1 and 2 above when they go >>> pending, and since that is the case, I wouldn't want to even see >>> these in any way shape of form. >>> >>> But I'd love to hear other's opinions. That's what makes this 'fun'. >> >> When you enable pending transactions in Preferences, by default, it >> does NOT display those transactions in the account register. It DOES >> display them in the Pending Transactions tab - which at least for me, >> shows up below the actual account register along with the Downloaded >> transactions tab and the Bills & Income Reminders tab. So if they >> later go away, they just go away from the Pending Transactions tab and >> never affect your account register. >> >> There is a 2nd level to this option (the right hand column of settings >> in Pending Transactions - Account Settings) where you can have them >> show up in the register. But that level is currently grayed out and >> can't be enable yet in the version I'm running which is the most >> recent release R55.26. >> >> So, presumably, once that right hand column is enabled to be used in >> the future, you will still have the option not to use that >> functionality, and just continue to have the pending transactions show >> up only in the separate Pending Transactions tab below. >> >> Hope I explained that right. So far I'm getting to like the feature, >> and I didn't think I was going to.... >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks....that might be reasonable to try as long as they don't > immediately show up in my register; another tab to see PENDING might > indeed work for me. As it is, I *do* go online to my credit and bank > accounts often to see any 'pending' transactions, so this might be a > better way to see that in one view. Appreciate the feedback. Yes, that's the way I see it also. I don't ever want to see the pending transactions in the account register (until cleared), but do like to be able to see them separately below.