Re: Proposing alt.security.engineering

"Adam H. Kerman" <[email protected]> posted:

> Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >or if there actually isn't why not just create a separate system that could 
> >be interoperable with usenet.
> 
> There are Web interfaces. I prefer a newsreader and traditional News
> server.
> 
> >i just don't understand the negativity here, something being unpopular doesn't
> >mean there isn't inherent value in it, i am a fan of distributed nearly uncensor-
> >able systems and i know i'm not the only one.
> 
> No one has judged the inherent value of the topic. The issue is whether
> you are motivated to build a Usenet audience. Discussion must come
> first. An empty newsgroup doesn't magically start discussion.
> 
> >"people have moved on" yet the protocol remains consistently active across a
> >variety of newsgroups.
> 
> It's a wonderful but less well known medium of communication.

actions speak louder than words and i hope that with time my contributions will
prove to be useful