Re: Defeat Python "Virtual Environment" in Fedora ?
Jon Ribbens <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:09:21 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc,comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-03-10, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/10/26 10:55, Rich wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.misc c186282 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 3/9/26 09:59, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >>>> c186282 <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> The Python VENV *seems* to be thwarting my >>>>> ability to run certain hard-core system >>>>> routines via "os.system()" or related. The >>>>> 'virtual' seems to be for idiot 7-year-olds >>>>> you don't want to crash the box. >>>>> >>>>> Well, sometimes, I *want* to crash the box. >>>> >>>> As Jon says, you’ve misdiagnosed your problem. >>> >>> COULD be ... >>> >>> But I still note that things that worked clean >>> and easy pre-VENV now DON'T. >>> >>> Who/what should I blame ? >>> >>> There's no POINT in a 'virtual environment/machine' >>> unless you PLAN to isolate the base machine from >>> the application to various degrees. >>> >>>> If you actually want someone to help solve your problem then you’ll have >>>> to accurately describe what you are trying and what is happening. In >>>> practice this means posting the exact code you are using and exactly >>>> what happens when you run it. >>> >>> Too fuckin' old now, not gonna get into a million >>> details and sub-sub-sub-config-files. I just report >>> that some lower-level OS commands no longer work >>> as expected, or at all, using the usual Python >>> utilities for doing so. >>> >>> I want the VENV *dead* ... CAN that be done ??? >> >> And, again, much as Jon said, you are blaming "venv's" but given us no >> examples to support your assertion. It is *very likely* that you >> indeed are blaming the wrong thing. How about creating a very short >> example that works without a venv but fails within one, and posting >> that example. That will give others, who may know far more python than >> you do, something to analyze and maybe show you where the problem >> really exists. > > Can't figure out how to zap the VENV in order > to provide the examples you'd like :-) > > Seems like, of late, it's entirely baked-in - > Python is the VENV and the VENV is Python. This not only isn't true, it cannot be true, because *by definition* if the environment you're seeing is the same one Python always sees then it isn't a "virtual" environment, it's the system environment.