Re: SCO 'who owns Linux' suit crushed yet again
[email protected] (Scott Dorsey)
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <[email protected]> wrote: >On 24 Aug 2026 02:50:42 GMT, Retrograde wrote: > >> The long legal battle over ownership of Linux is closer than ever to >> ending ... > >I keep thinking it’s the computer version of “Jarndyce vs Jarndyce” It pretty much is. SCO was once an active development company that made good software and was universally considered a great place to work. That was many decades ago. Now they do no development at all but only employ lawyers to protect the intellectual properties that they bought from others. At one point Microsoft was helping fund their various lawsuits to shut down manufacturers of Unix-like systems, but then that kind of ran out. Everybody thought it was gone until IBM settled a long-running suit from SCO out of court with a $21M payment, so SCO now has more money to sue more. We're up to 22 years now, and the only people who have benefitted from any of this mess are the lawyers. I'm not sure even Jarndyce vs. Jarndyce went on that long. But, like Jarndyce vs. Jarndyce everyone associated with suit has met some terrible fate. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."