Re: SSD TBW

Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups comp.misc,sci.electronics.design
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:45:55 -0700, Don Y wrote:

> On 8/23/2026 11:44 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>> So really, what you’ve got there is one giant bloated executable
>> that has to subsume the functions of what, in the Linux/*nix world,
>> would be a dozen separate tools -- including the format-guessing
>> functions of libmagic plus its own custom file explorer, it would
>> seem. Only in a less flexible, more monolithic form.
>
> It is extensible.  Ditto for CVS's handling of diff and merge.
>
> What you (don't yet!) have in your UNIX approach is many executables
> scattered around the file system, possibly not installed, and
> something that tries to invoke each based on some criteria.

The same applies to plugins for your “extensible” app. Only the Unix
tools offer a somewhat broader range of functionality in a more
versatile form. And we have package managers nowadays to manage
installation in a more tidy and scalable way.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.