Re: SSD TBW
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.misc,sci.electronics.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:45:55 -0700, Don Y wrote: > On 8/23/2026 11:44 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> So really, what you’ve got there is one giant bloated executable >> that has to subsume the functions of what, in the Linux/*nix world, >> would be a dozen separate tools -- including the format-guessing >> functions of libmagic plus its own custom file explorer, it would >> seem. Only in a less flexible, more monolithic form. > > It is extensible. Ditto for CVS's handling of diff and merge. > > What you (don't yet!) have in your UNIX approach is many executables > scattered around the file system, possibly not installed, and > something that tries to invoke each based on some criteria. The same applies to plugins for your “extensible” app. Only the Unix tools offer a somewhat broader range of functionality in a more versatile form. And we have package managers nowadays to manage installation in a more tidy and scalable way.