Re: Linux 7.2
c186282 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/18/26 18:16, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> The pixie girl is there to *try* to halt the onslaught of the AI >> companies that do abjectly stupid things like download every version of >> linux on kernel.org from 0.0.1 through to 7.2 278 times a day, every >> day, times 75 AI companies to feed to their AI models. >> >> I setup a really simple markov chain text generator as an AI honey pot >> on a server I admin and linked it to one, hidden (display: none; in the >> css) link on the page footer, with a robots.txt saying "don't access >> this link". > > You don't need to try hard to trap one of these crawlers like that. > Just enable PHPSESSID on a PHP website and every time it gets a new > session variable it will think it's found a whole new website, > while remembering to still go back and re-crawl the site with all > the old PHPSESSIDs it's ever received. "AmazonBot" is still trying > old PHPSESSID URLs on one site many months after I disabled > generating them. > > It's more than a little ironic that the "AI revolution" seems to > have born a whole new level of idiocy in web crawling. We'll just > have to keep waiting until their money runs out I suppose... > >> That's why the pixie girl is there on kernel.org. You can like or >> dislike it, but the "burn" from the AI companies irresponsible accesses >> is the underlying cause. > > But how much "burn" for real users of such websites is acceptable? > They could password-protect the whole site and send out passwords > to just the people who they think matter, telling everyone else to > bugger off. Somewhere between that and trying to optimise/upgrade > their website to handle the new AI load without adding any new > access restrictions is the "pixie girl" solution which just tells > people like me using obscure web browsers to bugger off. I still > won't be OK with effectively being told to bugger off, especially > by an organisation with as much money as The Linux Foundation > (though browsing their Git repos is still working for me in Dillo). Sounds more like LAWYERS, rather than creaky tech fixes, is what's needed. Multiple orgs can hire a firm specializing in tech abuse.