Re: verification of a cross-validation workflow
Eibe Frank <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.weka |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That looks fine to me. Of course, the ModelPerformanceChart is optional assuming you just want to see summary statistics. Cheers, Eibe > On 13/01/2022, at 2:53 AM, Pretnar, Ajda <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Weka community, > > I am writing a section on software comparison and I wish to describe Weka accurately, so I am turning to the community for help. I am a complete novice. I wish to build the simplest k-fold cross-validation workflow possible, preferably within a visual programming environment. > If I understand correctly, the visual programming environment would correspond to the KnowledgeFlow Environment? > > <Weka_KnowledgeFlow_workflow.png> > > Would the above image accurately (and not redundantly) represent a simple 10-fold cross-validation with Random Forest? The end goal is to observe the ROC curves, confusion matrix and evaluation scores. > > Also, I am wondering whether Weka has any component/node recommendations? Either user- or rule-based? > > Thank you so much for your input! > > Sincerely, > Ajda > > _______________________________________________ > Wekalist mailing list -- [email protected] > Send posts to [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > To subscribe, unsubscribe, etc., visit https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wekalist.list.waikato.ac.nz > List etiquette: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/mailinglist_etiquette.html _______________________________________________ Wekalist mailing list -- [email protected] Send posts to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, etc., visit https://list.waikato.ac.nz/postorius/lists/wekalist.list.waikato.ac.nz List etiquette: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/mailinglist_etiquette.html