Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Ralph Goers <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:24:12 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.logging
Message-ID <BB5C9060-4BF1-448A-BBD3-678785F01069__24716.6589521386$1489083874$gmane$org@dslextreme.com>
--Apple-Mail=_00991089-6AC4-4519-8914-8A6F9E1F52DF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might be =
of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just =
release announcements.

Ralph

> On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't =
cause any issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should =
merge the dev lists into one, or if we need a common dev list for all =
devs to subscribe to (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't =
know what that list is for).
>=20
> On 9 March 2017 at 10:26, Ralph Goers <[email protected] =
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You should note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are =
=E2=80=9Cbinding=E2=80=9D. I don=E2=80=99t think that changes much =
however.
>=20
> =46rom a PMC perspective I have to say that keeping the user=E2=80=99s =
lists separate isn=E2=80=99t likely to be an issue as most of the things =
that would need to be discussed would be on a dev list anyway.
>=20
> Ralph
>=20
>> On Mar 9, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Dominik Psenner <[email protected] =
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>=20
>> The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so =
that I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to =
summarize the current state of the vote:
>>=20
>> log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> =
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Matt Sicker: +1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Stefan Bodewig: +1
>> Sven Rautenverg: -1
>> Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning: -0
>> Ivan Habunek: -0
>> Dominik Psenner: +1
>> Remko Popma: +1
>> Mikael St=C3=A5ldal: +0
>>=20
>> Totals so far:
>> +1: 5
>> +0: 1
>> -0: 2
>> -1: 1
>>=20
>> log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> =
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>=20
>> Matt Sicker: -1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Stefan Bodewig: -1
>> Sven Rautenverg: -1
>> Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning: -0
>> Ivan Habunek: -0
>> Dominik Psenner: +1
>> Remko Popma: +1
>> Mikael St=C3=A5ldal: -1
>>=20
>> Totals so far:
>> +1: 3
>> +0: 0
>> -0: 2
>> -1: 4
>> Sorry to anyone who's vote is missing.
>>=20
>> On 2017-03-08 05:20, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> I may be missing some mailing lists considering I just subscribed to =
half of them less than five minutes ago.
>>>=20
>>> This is a vote to merge the various Apache Logging Services mailing =
lists. The proposal is to combine them as follows:
>>>=20
>>> log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> =
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ =
-> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>=20
>>> commits@ and private@ remain the same as before.
>>>=20
>>> The proposal would also suggest that the old emails become aliases =
for the combined email names so as not to lose any future emails. To =
distinguish between projects, a subject tag can be added such as:
>>>=20
>>> [java]
>>> [net]
>>> [cxx]
>>> [php]
>>>=20
>>> Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, though it should =
help in gaining the attention of the appropriate audience.
>>>=20
>>> Voting:
>>>=20
>>> +1: Yes, combine the mailing lists!
>>> +0: Go ahead, don't care that much.
>>> -0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it.
>>> -1: No, don't do that! I have a better idea!
>>>=20
>>> This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at least 3 +1 binding, =
no -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and whatnot. The vote will be =
open for at least 72 hours.
>>>=20
>>> --=20
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>


--Apple-Mail=_00991089-6AC4-4519-8914-8A6F9E1F52DF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D""><div class=3D"">We use general as mainly an announcement list =
for topics that might be of general interest to all logging projects. =
Generally, these are just release announcements.</div><div class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Ralph</div><br =
class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On =
Mar 9, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" class=3D"">[email protected]</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div =
dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"">Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain =
separate as it doesn't cause any issues currently. The main idea here is =
whether we should merge the dev lists into one, or if we need a common =
dev list for all devs to subscribe to (general@ doesn't sound =
appropriate, but I don't know what that list is for).</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 9 =
March 2017 at 10:26, Ralph Goers <span dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"">&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br =
class=3D""><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div =
style=3D"word-wrap:break-word" class=3D""><div class=3D"">You should =
note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are =E2=80=9Cbinding=E2=
=80=9D. I don=E2=80=99t think that changes much however.</div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">=46rom a PMC perspective =
I have to say that keeping the user=E2=80=99s lists separate isn=E2=80=99t=
 likely to be an issue as most of the things that would need to be =
discussed would be on a dev list anyway.</div><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font=
 color=3D"#888888" class=3D""><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">Ralph</div></font></span><div class=3D""><div class=3D"h5"><br =
class=3D""><div class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">On Mar 9, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Dominik Psenner &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"m_-3547174407184483746Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D"">=

 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000" class=3D""><p class=3D"">The =
votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists
      so that I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying
      to summarize the current state of the vote:</p>
    <pre class=3D"">log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ =
-&gt; <a class=3D"m_-3547174407184483746moz-txt-link-abbreviated" =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" =
target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a></pre><p class=3D"">Matt =
Sicker: +1<br class=3D"">
      Ralph Goers: +1<br class=3D"">
      Stefan Bodewig: +1<br class=3D"">
      Sven Rautenverg: -1<br class=3D"">
      Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning: -0<br class=3D"">
      Ivan Habunek: -0<br class=3D"">
      Dominik Psenner: +1<br class=3D"">
      Remko Popma: +1<br class=3D"">
      Mikael St=C3=A5ldal: +0</p><p class=3D"">Totals so far:<br =
class=3D"">
      +1: 5<br class=3D"">
      +0: 1<br class=3D"">
      -0: 2<br class=3D"">
      -1: 1</p>
    <pre class=3D"">log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, =
log4cxx-user@, general@ -&gt; <a =
class=3D"m_-3547174407184483746moz-txt-link-abbreviated" =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" =
target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>

Matt Sicker: -1
Ralph Goers: +1
Stefan Bodewig: -1
Sven Rautenverg: -1
Thorsten Sch=C3=B6ning: -0
Ivan Habunek: -0
Dominik Psenner: +1
Remko Popma: +1
Mikael St=C3=A5ldal: -1

Totals so far:
+1: 3
+0: 0
-0: 2
-1: 4
</pre>
    Sorry to anyone who's vote is missing.<br class=3D"">
    <br class=3D"">
    <div class=3D"m_-3547174407184483746moz-cite-prefix">On 2017-03-08 =
05:20, Matt Sicker wrote:<br class=3D"">
    </div>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D"">
      <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"">I may be missing some mailing lists =
considering I
        just subscribed to half of them less than five minutes ago.
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">This is a vote to merge the various Apache =
Logging Services
          mailing lists. The proposal is to combine them as =
follows:</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, =
log4cxx-dev@ -&gt;
          <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">[email protected]</a></div>
        <div class=3D"">log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, =
log4cxx-user@,
          general@ -&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" =
target=3D"_blank" class=3D"">[email protected]</a></div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">commits@ and private@ remain the same as =
before.</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">The proposal would also suggest that the old =
emails become
          aliases for the combined email names so as not to lose any
          future emails. To distinguish between projects, a subject tag
          can be added such as:</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">[java]</div>
        <div class=3D"">[net]</div>
        <div class=3D"">[cxx]</div>
        <div class=3D"">[php]</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, =
though it
          should help in gaining the attention of the appropriate
          audience.</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">Voting:</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">+1: Yes, combine the mailing lists!</div>
        <div class=3D"">+0: Go ahead, don't care that much.</div>
        <div class=3D"">-0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it.</div>
        <div class=3D"">-1: No, don't do that! I have a better =
idea!</div>
        <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
        </div>
        <div class=3D"">This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at =
least 3 +1
          binding, no -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and
          whatnot. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.<br =
clear=3D"all" class=3D"">
          <div class=3D""><br class=3D"">
          </div>
          -- <br class=3D"">
          <div class=3D"m_-3547174407184483746gmail_signature">Matt =
Sicker &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">[email protected]</a>&gt;</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br class=3D"">
  </div>

</div></blockquote></div><br =
class=3D""></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""><br =
clear=3D"all" class=3D""><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div>-- <br =
class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_signature" =
data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature">Matt Sicker &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">[email protected]</a>&gt;</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_00991089-6AC4-4519-8914-8A6F9E1F52DF--