Re: Metuxmpm test failed

-                                                 [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

> Any clues as how to fix it?

I am not a good programmer and I don't know how apache function. I don't know 
"ideology" of apache. But if I develop metuxmpm, I will do something like 
qmail, because I like modular structure. I think, multiplexer must be an 
separate program, not apache program, which only get data from tcp socket and 
multiplex it to ordinary apache process rely on http header. 

Particular apache process must serve only virtual hosts which requrire the 
same uid/gid. And maybe we need one more process, name it manager, to fork 
multiplexer and apache processes and serve configuration settings to these 
processes in right way.

We already have apache process developed by apache team  and it seemes to be 
stable. So we need only multiplexer and manager. Why we use apache code to 
create multiplexer? May be it will be less buggy to write it from white 
paper? It's not a big piece of code, as I see.