Re: Metuxmpm test failed

-                                                 [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:37:49PM +0400, Dmitry P. Schegolev wrote:

<snip>
> I am not a good programmer and I don't know how apache function. I don't know 
> "ideology" of apache. But if I develop metuxmpm, I will do something like 
> qmail, because I like modular structure. I think, multiplexer must be an 
  ^^^^
aah ... djb's a fool ;-)

> separate program, not apache program, which only get data from tcp socket and 
> multiplex it to ordinary apache process rely on http header. 
too slow, too resource intensive.
yet possible w/ squid.

<snip>
> We already have apache process developed by apache team  and it seemes to be 
> stable. So we need only multiplexer and manager. Why we use apache code to 
> create multiplexer? May be it will be less buggy to write it from white 
> paper? It's not a big piece of code, as I see.
there are several reasons, i.e. reusing mod_ssl for ssl handling and 
other similar cases.


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT services

 phone:     +49 36207 519931         www:       http://www.metux.de/     
 fax:       +49 36207 519932         email:     [email protected]
 cellphone: +49 174 7066481	     
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt.      http://www.metux.de/uucp/