Re: old seg faults and changes

On Aug 11, 2004, at 7:00 PM, mpeters wrote:

> In trying to research our problem with the seg faults I came across 
> this link that talked about someone with a problem that seemed 
> somewhat similar.
>
> http://lists.backhand.org/pipermail/backhand-users/2001-February.txt

I don't remember anything going to the list in regards to that (not 
saying it didn't, just saying I don't remember).  The mention from the 
post above is so vague as to be useless now.

>
> It comes from 2001 and the person who posted said they would notify 
> mod_log_spread maintainers of a problem they found. I couldn't find a 
> posting listing the problem to the mls list (did it exist at that 
> time? is the list archived?).
>
> Also I saw that the last change to mod_log_spread was 2000-10-21. So 
> it didn't look like there was anything done about it.
>
> I know I might be taxing some memories here, but does anyone remember 
> the above bug? The poster to the backhand list didn't give specifics 
> on his solution. We are still trying to track this thing down. As I 
> said before, we traced to seg faults to Apache::warn. I know that 
> mod_lod_spread handles access logs, but does it mess with/harm the 
> code for error logs?

No... you can't directly affect error logging in Apache 1.3 without 
patching Apache core code.

George