Re: spreadlogd 1.4.2, spread 3.16.2, FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE

Can you ty out a hunch of mine and only use machine names in you 
spread.conf which are below the MAX_PROC_NAME define in spread_params.h 
(it defaults to 20).  

Jay West wrote:

>The problem that Mike Parson and I have, has apparently been a long standing
>problem that has either never been fixed, or was fixed but resurfaced
>*sigh*.
>
>I did a search on google for "spreadlogd segmentation fault freebsd" and got
>the following article...
>
>http://lists.spread.org/pipermail/spread-users/2001-July/000144.html  (look
>under the section "original message")
>
>This guy had the exact same problem we're currently having, where spreadlogd
>starts, but soon as it receives one message it writes that one message to
>the log file and then segfaults.
>
>I will query the original poster I guess and see if they ever found a fix
>for this, I'm kinda desperate to get spreadlogd up today since the go-live
>date for the new site is tomorrow. Maybe as an interim I'll just move the
>logs via scp and merge them manually for a while.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jay West
>
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mls-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/mls-users
>