Re: problem with error_log_spread.pl

+1 for run-time configurability.

Theo E. Schlossnagle wrote:

> Yair Amir wrote:
>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> Thanks. That helps to know.
>>
>> I think we would just change the argument in the Spread code to 25
>> to avoid unnecessary config file parameters...
>>
>> Any problem with that?
>
>
> I think it is silly to not make it an option. 25 is pretty high for 
> every day usage.  Besdides, it wouldn't be a _necessary_ config file 
> option anyway.  If it is completely left out, it will work as it does 
> now.
>
> Seems a lot more flexible and people can experiment with values to 
> find what works best for them if they need to.
>