Re[2]: problem with error_log_spread.pl

Hi,

What I really wanted to understand is what is the drawback of make it,
say 100. What is the cost associated with making it 100?
If there is no cost, why not do it? If the cost is maintaining a few
bytes per each potential concurrent connection request, a few hundred
bytes are not an issue, are they?

(although a config option is a big issue when people don't understand
them - just look at all these people that set maturity to 5 seconds in
wackamole because this is how a programmer experimented with it).
People have very little time these days to read...

      :) Yair.
      
Theo> Yair Amir wrote:

>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> Thanks. That helps to know.
>>
>> I think we would just change the argument in the Spread code to 25
>> to avoid unnecessary config file parameters...
>>
>> Any problem with that?

Theo> I think it is silly to not make it an option. 25 is pretty high for every day 
Theo> usage.  Besdides, it wouldn't be a _necessary_ config file option anyway.  If 
Theo> it is completely left out, it will work as it does now.

Theo> Seems a lot more flexible and people can experiment with values to find what 
Theo> works best for them if they need to.