Re: A few simple ones (I hope)

Christopher Powell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-log-sql
Organization Grubby Baby Graphic Design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, March 23, 2003 00:01, Iceic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just recently install mod_log_sql into my copy of Apache 1.3.26
> running on RH 7.1
> Everything operates as well as could be expected - it even did
> everything on my first attempt
> at starting apache - my most successful mod install to date.
>
> I just had a few questions for you all regarding a few things I'd like
> to get out of mod_log_sql but
> can't seem to find the information regarding it, despite some intensive
> searching in the docs.
>
> I'm running the LogSQLMassVirtualHosting directive as I'm running apache
> in a similar fashion. This
> works fine at creating the necessary tables etc, but there's a few
> things that I'm confused on how
> to achieve, if in fact these things are achievable with the current
> version of mod_log_sql.
>
> 1- Is it possible to control what logging information is being outputted
> to the db? Most of what I can
>     find regarding this is restricted to VirtualHost directives, which I
> don't use.

See if the LogSQLTransferLogFormat directive works for you in a general 
context.  In your setup it may be fine.

> 2- I don't foresee any need for the headout, headin, notes and cookies
> tables in my application, and as such
>     I'd like to be able to tell mod_log_sql to not bother outputting
> them, as it'll just consume disk space?

Well, currently this isn't possible in the MassVirtualHosting setup; the 
module automatically creates the tables if they don't exist.  This introduces 
a little bit of clutter, I suppose, but negligible space waste.

> 3- Whilst I can appreciate that this is the way it does things, I
> thought I might ask if anyone had found a
>     way around it. In a LogSQLMassVirtualHosting environment visits to
> the site www.blah.com <http://www.blah.com/>  and blah.com are
>     recorded under two separate tables. Whilst it's possible for me to
> code the application around this I thought I might
>     just double check if there's an easy way to get this done in the
> logging process.

This is a common problem but easily fixed using UseCanonicalName -- see FAQ 
entry 4.4.1 .

Regards,
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+gd3UYLVoao8MjQkRAuQzAKCDc/qwqh0cCnS5Ve5Uk8toff14OwCeKWAU
yBkNlZhK7+bemvNE7NIuXN0=
=3bAW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

__________________________________________________________________
Reminder: to unsubscribe, send email to <[email protected]>
with the words "unsubscribe mod_log_sql" in the body (w/o quotes).
The module homepage is http://www.grubbybaby.com/mod_log_sql/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.