Re: Are there windows binaries for 5.20?

Steve Hay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl
Message-ID <CADED=K5dUUmz6bJxwo_Hy1sKjG7XvCpf++HOhP-JzaKwZct81w@mail.gmail.com>
On 17 February 2015 at 09:40, Michael Lackhoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 15.02.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Steve Hay:
>
>>>> If you want 32-bit then the easiest way is to build it yourself using
>>>> a perl that you built yourself with the same compiler.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a recommended compiler? I use Strawberry perl, do you know
>>> which compiler is used for that perl? As you say, it would be better to
>>> use the same. And I would like to stick to it because there are so many
>>> binaries of difficult modules already included.
>>>
>>
>> Unfortunately you'll need to use VC++ for now because mod_perl doesn't
>> currently support gcc/dmake (which is what both StrawberryPerl and
>> ActivePerl now use). I hope to fix that soon, though...
>
>
> I tried it and made some progress but am not there yet...
>
> Here is what I did (everything within a clean Windows 7 32 bit VM with VC9,
> both with SP1 and all updates installed):
> 1. Compile perl 5.20.1
> 2. add APXS to Apache 2.2.29 (tried both self compiled and Apache Lounge VC9
> binary)
> 3. Compile and install mod_perl with/to the perl from step 1.
> 4. Start Apache with mod_perl -> works
>
> but from there on I got into problems...
>
> 5. extract a fresh Strawberry Perl 5.20.1 32-bit portable
> 6. copy everything relevant(?) according to the file list of Steve's 5.16.3
> 32-bit package from the self-compiled Perl to the Strawberry tree.
> 7. change PATH to point to Strawberry perl
> 8. Start Apache with mod_perl -> crashes
>
> Now I have a somewhat working mod_perl but cannot use it in my environment
> (and there are good reasons to use Stawberry).
>
> Please, can you give a detailed recipe, especially with the steps necessary
> to transfer the compiled mod_perl stuff to Strawberry?
>

You can't. The VC9 build of the mod_perl components are not compatible
with StrawberryPerl, which is built with gcc and therefore uses a
different CRT (msvcrt.dll vs msvcr90.dll).

The 32-bit components that I've built before were built with VC6 in
order to use the same CRT as StrawberryPerl/ActivePerl, but that's no
longer an option since ActiveState only make 64-bit-int versions of
their 32-bit ActivePerl available now and the 64-bit-int build option
doesn't work with VC6 due to bugs in that ancient compiler. I can make
a 32-bit-int VC6 perl myself, of course, but then the mod_perl
components still won't match ActivePerl because of the 32/64-bit-int
mismatch... That is why I've only made 64-bit versions available
recently...

And that's why I need to change mod_perl so that it can be built with gcc/dmake.

(I asked ActiveState to consider making 32-bit-int versions available
as well (like StrawberryPerl do), but they declined.)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.